Western painting
tl;dr Look at the pictures you haven’t seen before.
Here I list my favorite western painting art across the centuries and explain in my own simple terms how it all ties up. I won’t bore you with Wikipedia style explanation.
I never thought of myself as an appreciator of the history of painting, but I realized recently that even though my knowledge has huge gaps I still probably know a way lot more that the average person cares for. More importantly, I have found so many paintings and artists that I like that I risk forgetting them if I don’t organize my knowledge and memories somehow. So I’m starting one big page here, organized roughly by publication year because it helps me visualize the chronology better than grouping by art styles — which I don’t even really know.
Medieval art (1400)
No matter how I look at it, all medieval art is terrible to me. The proportions are all wrong, stylization is crap, and religious themes ruin everything with their stiffness. The only good artist I know from this period is the late medieval artist Hieronymus Bosch whose paintings are so surreal that they force you stop and look more carefully.
I don’t mean to say Bosch is good merely because his paintings are unintentionally funny. Rather, I find that the best paintings from any period tend to employ storytelling well. Simple portrait paintings are often boring to me, but fantastic and mythologic paintings, or anything with action or death tend to catch my attention.
All the paintings on this page employ oil painting, which became the dominant form of painting just around the time of Bosch.
The Italian masters (1500)
To simply explain the meaning of “Renaissance” in relation to painting: in the Italian city of Florence people started to pay attention to knowledge stored in antique Roman/Greek age recordings and otherwise grew bored of the crappy medieval art style. Whatever the causes, the quality of painting in Italy surged rapidly during this period, and in the opinion of some has only gone down since. These guys were seriously good. The larger Renaissance movement was big enough to formally end the “middle ages”.
Leonardo da Vinci is from this period but I’m not listing him because the point of this article isn’t to show famous paintings, but the ones that I genuinely appreciate.
Symbolism and technique seems to come naturally to the best works of this period.
Some of Raphael’s works such as “Lo Spasimo di Sicilia” show amazing technique considering the period, but I find the works otherwise lacking.
Michelangelo seems to have been a sculptor foremost, so it’s rather unbelievable that he could also paint something like the “Creation of Adam”.
Early Dutch
Bosch and his contemporaries seem to have started a separate force of art in the Netherlands that will later reach a “Golden age”. Until then there are artists such as Pieter Brueghel the Elder setting the foundations.
Mannerism
Mannerism was an art style in the late Renaissance whose main point seems to have been exaggeration of beauty. The important point here is perhaps that the art continued to evolve and the changes between the periods were not sudden. The following painting by Wtewael actually came later than Caravaggio’s baroque paintings below.
Baroque (1600), Italians
Put simply, I think the Baroque style signifies the start of really using black in painting. Very dark shadows, strong colors, lots of emotion in the storytelling.
Caravaggio
Gentileschi
Artemisia Gentileschi is the first woman artist in my chronology. I tend to like women artists in every medium and painting is no exception. Her works are by far the most gruesome, often featuring severed heads.
Reni
Baroque (1600), Belgium
To be clear, at this point great paintings are also being created in other parts of Europe, here are some painters from the area that is now Belgium.
Baroque (1600), Dutch
Now we are entering the golden age of Dutch painting. Basically the Dutch were a very powerful colonial empire at this time and their wealth enabled also artists to flourish compared to other nations.
Rembrandt
I’m still a bit on the fence about Rembrandt. His technique is great and the volume and breadth of his work immense: Other artists at his time would only painting portraits, or only painting landscapes, or only paint “genre” works. Rembrandt could do all of those easily. Yet, looking at his whole output I have trouble finding pieces that really capture my attention. Even his most famous work “Night Watch” fails to move me.
van der Neer
This work caught my attention with its strong stylization that is so essential in the modern times but wasn’t back then.
Vermeer
Johannes Vermeer’s works seem to be held in high regard because of the artist’s unprecedent ability to render light so accurately. His works take on photographic qualities, which has led academics to speculate he used advanced optical tools as part of his painting process.
Personally I don’t care about the history, only what the paintings look like. And here I don’t find Vermeer that special. The only painting of his that I like and find evocative is the girl with the earring, and I suspect that too is mainly due to being conditioned to like old art. It’s hard to look truly objectively at famous works.
1700
West
Turner
Rendering seascapes takes such special skill that there was a big genre of “Marine art”, of which Turner was a master:
1800
Rivière
Impressionism (1850)
Fair enough, the artists eventually bore of drawing everything in the same realistic way and tried to embrace the infinite possibilities of drawing. To me the style they first chose here does not really matter — the important thing was the unshackling of expression.
Realism
Bouguereau
William-Adolphe Bouguereau was an “academic painter” which apparently means he kept up with the old traditions while nonsense such as impressionism was getting the attention.
Finnish art
The next entries show my special interest in Finnish art.
Edelfelt
Later
Waterhouse
, by John William Waterhouse (1882) Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Siemiradzki
Finnish Romantic nationalism
Gallen-Kallela
Later works
Painting obviously did not end at the turn of the 20th century, but the paintings I like from that time on look very different and in my opinion do not really fit the continuum of realistic painting of humans that this page covers.




































































